The Royal Python Forum
The Royal Python Forum
Home | Profile | Register | Active Topics | Members | Search | FAQ
 All Forums
 Royal Python Posts
 Royal Python Morphs
 Reduced pattern; dominant, co-dom or recessive

Note: You must be registered in order to post a reply.
To register, click here. Registration is FREE!

Screensize:
UserName:
Password:
Format Mode:
Format: BoldItalicizedUnderlineStrikethrough Align LeftCenteredAlign Right Horizontal Rule Insert HyperlinkInsert EmailInsert Image Insert CodeInsert QuoteInsert List
   
Message:

* HTML is OFF
* Forum Code is ON
Smilies
Smile [:)] Big Smile [:D] Cool [8D] Blush [:I]
Tongue [:P] Evil [):] Wink [;)] Clown [:o)]
Black Eye [B)] Eight Ball [8] Frown [:(] Shy [8)]
Shocked [:0] Angry [:(!] Dead [xx(] Sleepy [|)]
Kisses [:X] Approve [^] Disapprove [V] Question [?]

 
   

T O P I C    R E V I E W
AndyJ80 Posted - 03/10/2012 : 20:05:39
Hi guys,

I have a simple question for you. A reduced pattern royal, is it a dom, co-dom, or a recessive gene?
I've looked online and there seem to be various thoughts, some say dom and others say recessive. Looking at the genetic wizard there doesn't seem to be an option for a reduced pattern, so further research was done and people seem to be calling them 'banded' which again has no clear answer on the dominance of the gene.
So what do you guys think?

Andy
1   L A T E S T    R E P L I E S    (Newest First)
IncurableFlirt Posted - 04/10/2012 : 07:22:20
From what I have been able to gather, there is actually a genetic "reduced pattern" out there. Many of the reduced pattern Royals that I've come across have had a very "banded" appearance:

Akenahten



Astrid (my nephew's female)




We plan to do some trial breeding with Astrid and Aken when Astrid reaches breeding size/age. I, too, would be curious to know if anyone else has any input on the reduced patterns. :)

The Royal Python Forum © THEROYALPYTHON.co.uk Go To Top Of Page
Snitz Forums 2000